Nigeria is, once again, retrogressing into the dark era of selective prosecution of perceived opponents of the ruling government, using the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) as a willing tool.
The recent siege by the attack dogs of the country’s anti-graft agency, EFCC, on the premises of the Lagos University Teaching Hospital (LUTH), Idi-Araba, Lagos, where the Chairman of Bi-Courtney Highway Services Limited, Dr. Wale Babalakin, was on admission is definitely a pointer to this.
By this single action, targeted at an unarmed citizen, which many consider as naive and brutal, EFCC may just be telling Nigerians that the inglorious do or die era, with its clear signature of oppression and ruthlessness, is simply back with them.
It however took the wisdom and determination of the LUTH management to prevent the EFCC goons from carrying out their mission as the dogged LUTH officials denied the EFCC army of occupation access to the private ward where Babalakin was being admitted.
The invading army of the EFCC initially attempted to bulldoze its way into Babalakin’s ward, resulting in a heated war of words with the hospital staff. The late night confrontation, in fact, lasted till the early hours of the following day. It’s quite frightening that after failing in their mission, several policemen and plain-clothes operatives remained at the entrance of Babalakin’s ward and its adjoining areas.
It is worthy to note that Bi-Courtney, a company which Babalakin owns, had been in court with EFCC over allegations of fraud against him. And EFCC appears to be getting frustrated as Babalakin’s proposed arraignment, alongside four others, at the Lagos High Court, Ikeja, over their roles in an alleged N4.7 billion Delta State money transfer fraud could not be pursued due to his ill-health.
Being a lawyer of repute and a Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN) for that matter, Babalakin had embarked on a spirited battle to stop further arraignment at the Lagos High Court. He, in fact, secured a Federal High Court (FHC), Lagos, leave to apply for certiorari (an order quashing an action) and prohibition.
Justice Mohammed Idris gave the order, following a motion ex-parte filed by the applicant’s counsel, Mr. Wale Akoni (SAN), seeking an order of court for leave to apply for certi-orari and prohibition against the respondents, restraining them from taking further steps in the arraignment, pending the hearing of the motion before the FHC.
The curious dimension to Babalakin’s harassment by the EFCC could be traced to the fact that the Federal Government, claiming breaches, had terminated the concession contract for the Lagos-Ibadan Expressway granted to Bi-Courtney Highway Services Limited on May 8, 2009; an agreement that was signed on May 26, 2009.
Apparently, the EFCC hounding of Babalakin’s Bi-Courtney amounts to a clear violation of a citizen’s rights and an attempt to thwart justice. Head of Communication for Bi-Courtney Highway Services Limited, Mr. Dipo Kehinde, said, “This is a new trend in judicial administration in Nigeria and it reflects desperation by EFCC to violate provisions of the law and constitution in order to circumvent justice, and a violation of the basic human rights of the citizen.”
According to Kehinde, “It is noteworthy that this brings back the sad memories of the days of Gen. Sani Abacha, when the rights of Nigerians were trampled upon with ease.”
It is unfortunate that despite an order of a court of competent jurisdiction, EFCC had been trailing Babalakin without let or hindrance. And the anti-graft agency seems not to agree that a court had issued an order against it. EFCC’s spokesman, Wilson Uwujaren, in fact, said: “Our commission has no order restraining us from arresting him. What Babalakin sought was an order of certiorari to quash the charges.
The court only granted him leave; so we are keeping eyes on him. If he is still in the hospital, our men will be there, if he moves to his house, our men will equally go there.”
According to Uwujaren, “The order does not prevent us from arresting him. The order was only for leave to apply for an order of certi-orari to quash the charges against him and for it to act as a stay of proceedings at the Lagos High Court where he is facing criminal charges of money laundering.”
Recall that EFCC had filed a 27-count charge against Babalakin, Stabilini Visioni Limited, Bi-Courtney Limited as well as Alex Okoh and Remix Nigeria Limited for allegedly fraudulently assisting former governor of Delta State, James Ibori, to launder various sums of money through third parties to some foreign accounts under the guise of buying a Challenger Jet.
Many observers of the development, however, believe that the EFCC should apply civilised principles in prosecuting its so-called war against corruption as it definitely smacks of mischief that it was only when Babalakin had a disagreement with the Federal Government over the Lagos-Ibadan Expressway concession that the EFCC decided to wake up from slumber on the money laundering case.
The attack dogs of the EFCC would do well to remember this proverb: “A freeborn asked to do the job of a slave should at least apply the work ethics of a freeborn.”
The nation should resist any attempt to return it to the evil days of military rule when the courts amounted to nothing, as the EFCC appears to be leading the evil march back to barbarism. Its attack dogs must therefore be called to order immediately in the interests of the good health of the Nigerian nation.
We must also empathise that the EFCC has failed to win the anti-corruption war for which it was initially set up to combat. Politicians, civil servants and their cronies in the private sector have stepped up the looting of billions of Naira from the treasury of Federal, State and Local Governments.
source: THEWILL
Sunday, December 9, 2012
Thursday, November 29, 2012
U.N. Assembly, in Blow to U.S., Elevates Status of Palestine
More than 130 countries voted on Thursday to upgrade Palestine to a nonmember observer state of the United Nations, a triumph for Palestinian diplomacy and a sharp rebuke to the United States and Israel.
But the vote, at least for now, did little to bring either the Palestinians or the Israelis closer to the goal they claim to seek: two states living side by side, or increased Palestinian unity. Israel and the militant group Hamas both responded critically to the day’s events, though for different reasons.
The new status will give the Palestinians more tools to challenge Israel
in international legal forums for its occupation activities in the West
Bank, including settlement-building, and it helped bolster the Palestinian Authority, weakened after eight days of battle between its rival Hamas and Israel.
But even as a small but determined crowd of 2,000 celebrated in central
Ramallah in the West Bank, waving flags and dancing, there was an
underlying sense of concerned resignation.
“I hope this is good,” said Munir Shafie, 36, an electrical engineer who was there. “But how are we going to benefit?”
Still, the General Assembly vote — 138 countries in favor, 9 opposed and
41 abstaining — showed impressive backing for the Palestinians at a
difficult time. It was taken on the 65th anniversary of the vote to
divide the former British mandate of Palestine into two states, one
Jewish and one Arab, a vote Israel considers the international seal of
approval for its birth.
The past two years of Arab uprisings have marginalized the Palestinian
cause to some extent as nations that focused their political aspirations
on the Palestinian struggle have turned inward. The vote on Thursday,
coming so soon after the Gaza fighting, put the Palestinians again — if briefly, perhaps — at the center of international discussion.
“The question is, where do we go from here and what does it mean?” Salam
Fayyad, the Palestinian prime minister, who was in New York for the
vote, said in an interview. “The sooner the tough rhetoric of this can
subside and the more this is viewed as a logical consequence of many
years of failure to move the process forward, the better.” He said
nothing would change without deep American involvement.
President Mahmoud Abbas
of the Palestinian Authority, speaking to the assembly’s member
nations, said, “The General Assembly is called upon today to issue a
birth certificate of the reality of the state of Palestine,” and he
condemned what he called Israeli racism and colonialism. His remarks
seemed aimed in part at Israel and in part at Hamas. But both quickly
attacked him for the parts they found offensive.
“The world watched a defamatory and venomous speech that was full of
mendacious propaganda against the Israel Defense Forces and the citizens
of Israel,” Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel responded.
“Someone who wants peace does not talk in such a manner.”
While Hamas had officially backed the United Nations bid of Mr. Abbas,
it quickly criticized his speech because the group does not recognize
Israel.
“There are controversial issues in the points that Abbas raised, and
Hamas has the right to preserve its position over them,” said Salah
al-Bardaweel, a spokesman for Hamas in Gaza, on Thursday.
“We do not recognize Israel, nor the partition of Palestine, and Israel
has no right in Palestine,” he added. “Getting our membership in the
U.N. bodies is our natural right, but without giving up any inch of
Palestine’s soil.”
Israel’s ambassador to the United Nations, Ron Prosor, spoke after Mr.
Abbas and said he was concerned that the Palestinian Authority failed to
recognize Israel for what it is.
“Three months ago, Israel’s prime minister stood in this very hall and
extended his hand in peace to President Abbas,” Mr. Prosor said. “He
reiterated that his goal was to create a solution of two states for two
peoples, where a demilitarized Palestinian state will recognize Israel
as a Jewish state.
“That’s right. Two states for two peoples. In fact, President Abbas, I
did not hear you use the phrase ‘two states for two peoples’ this
afternoon. In fact, I have never heard you say the phrase ‘two states
for two peoples’ because the Palestinian leadership has never recognized
that Israel is the nation-state of the Jewish people.”
The Israelis also say that the fact that Mr. Abbas is not welcome in
Gaza, the Palestinian coastal enclave run by Hamas, from which he was
ejected five years ago, shows that there is no viable Palestinian
leadership living up to its obligations now.
As expected, the vote won backing from a number of European countries,
and was a rebuff to intense American and Israeli diplomacy. France,
Spain, Italy and Switzerland all voted yes. Britain and Germany
abstained. Apart from Canada, no major country joined the United States
and Israel in voting no. The other opponents included Palau, Panama and
Micronesia.
Susan E. Rice, the American ambassador to the United Nations, was
dismissive of the entire exercise. “Today’s grand pronouncements will
soon fade,” she said. “And the Palestinian people will wake up tomorrow
and find that little about their lives has changed, save that the
prospects of a durable peace have only receded.”
A major concern for the Americans is that the Palestinians may use their
new status to try to join the International Criminal Court. That
prospect particularly worries the Israelis, who fear that the
Palestinians may press for an investigation of their practices in the
occupied territories widely viewed as violations of international law.
Saeb Erekat, the chief Palestinian negotiator, said that after the vote
“life will not be the same” because “Palestine will become a country
under occupation.”
“The terms of reference for any negotiations become withdrawal,” Mr. Erekat said.
Another worry is that the Palestinians may use the vote to seek
membership in specialized agencies of the United Nations, a move that
could have consequences for the financing of the international
organizations as well as the Palestinian Authority itself. Congress cut
off financing to the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural
Organization, known as Unesco, in 2011 after it accepted Palestine as a
member. The United States is a major contributor to many of these
agencies and is active on their governing boards.
In response to the Palestinian bid, a bipartisan group of senators said
Thursday that they would introduce legislation that would cut off
foreign aid to the authority if it tried to use the International
Criminal Court against Israel, and close the Palestine Liberation
Organization’s office in Washington if Palestinians refused to negotiate
with Israel.
Calling the Palestinian bid “an unhealthy step that could undermine the
peace process,” Senator Lindsey Graham, Republican of South Carolina,
said that he and the other senators, including Charles E. Schumer,
Democrat of New York, would be closely monitoring the situation.
The vote came shortly after an eight-day Israeli military assault on
Gaza that Israel described as a response to stepped-up rocket fire into
Israel. The operation killed scores of Palestinians and was aimed at
reducing the arsenal of Hamas in Gaza, part of the territory that the
United Nations resolution expects to make up a future state of
Palestine.
The Palestinian Authority, based in Ramallah, was politically weakened
by the Gaza fighting, with its rivals in Hamas seen by many Palestinians
as more willing to stand up to Israel and fight back. That shift in
sentiment is one reason that some Western countries gave for backing the
United Nations resolution, to strengthen Mr. Abbas and his more
moderate colleagues in their contest with Hamas.
Jennifer Steinhauer contributed reporting from Washington, Isabel
Kershner from Jerusalem, and Khaled Abu Aker from Ramallah, West Bank.
OBAMA LUNCH WITH ROMNEY
*Romney, Obama have lunch, agree to ‘stay in touch.’ Maybe.
President Barack Obama and former Gov. Mitt Romney met for lunch at the White House on Thursday, their first face-to-face meeting since the bitter election campaign in which each man basically warned voters that the other risked destroying the economy. A syrupy White House statement released after the meal said they had discussed America's global leadership role and agreed on their desire to stay in touch. Maybe.
Romney arrived one minute early for the 12:30 p.m. lunch, walking into the West Wing through a side entrance a safe distance from the press. He walked out the same way at 1:43 p.m., even as Obama's press secretary Jay Carney gave only meager details of what he insisted was a "private" get-together between the president and his defeated Republican rival.
Romney "congratulated the president for the success of his campaign and wished him well over the coming four years," according to the White House account of the meal. "The focus of their discussion was on America's leadership in the world and the importance of maintaining that leadership position in the future.
"They pledged to stay in touch, particularly if opportunities to work together on shared interests arise in the future," the statement said.
The lunch menu included white turkey chili and Southwestern grilled chicken salad.
The White House barred reporters from the event, but released an official photo showing Obama giving Romney a tour of the Oval Office.
Carney, briefing reporters while the lunch was going on, predicted that the two men would compare experiences from the campaign trail. "There aren't that many people who have run, been nominees for their party. There aren't that many people you can talk to who know what it's like."
Obama is "very interested in some of Gov. Romney's ideas," Carney insisted. But, when pressed, he would highlight only the Republican's widely praised rescue of the Salt Lake City Olympics and say that Obama hoped to apply Romney's know-how to his own efforts to make government more efficient.
That's a skill set, not an idea, one reporter pointed out. So are there actually ideas of Romney's that the president always either supported or opposed in the campaign but is now rethinking?
"There were certainly things that the two men agreed on" during the campaign, Carney said. "I wouldn't say it was the majority of things. It wasn't."
Still, Carney pointed to the three presidential debates and underlined that the erstwhile rivals had frequently professed to agree with each other.
He's right. Here's a sample of some of those moments. Note that some of the "agreements" are tactical attempts to score political points rather than any sincere assertion of commonality of purpose.
From the first debate:
Obama: "Gov. Romney and I both agree that our corporate tax rate is too high."
"I agree that the Democratic legislators in Massachusetts might have given some advice to Republicans in Congress about how to cooperate."
Romney: "I agree, education is key, particularly the future of our economy."
"We agree; we ought to bring the tax rates down, and I do, both for corporations and for individuals."
"Let's come back to something the president (and) I agree on, which is the key task we have in health care is to get the costs down so it's more affordable for families."
Or this exchange:
Obama: "One of the things I suspect Gov. Romney and I probably agree on is getting businesses to work with community colleges so that they're setting up their training programs ..."
Moderator Jim Lehrer: "Do you agree, Governor?"
Obama: "Let—let—let me just finish the point."
Romney: "Oh, yeah. Oh, yeah."
Or this one:
Lehrer: "Can the two of you agree that the voters have a choice, a clear choice, between the two of you?"
Romney: "Absolutely."
Obama: "Yes."
Sources:(Pete Souza/official White House photo) (Jason Reed/Reuters)
Mitt Romney arrives the White House |
![]() |
Mitt Romney and Barack Obama |
President Barack Obama and former Gov. Mitt Romney met for lunch at the White House on Thursday, their first face-to-face meeting since the bitter election campaign in which each man basically warned voters that the other risked destroying the economy. A syrupy White House statement released after the meal said they had discussed America's global leadership role and agreed on their desire to stay in touch. Maybe.
Romney arrived one minute early for the 12:30 p.m. lunch, walking into the West Wing through a side entrance a safe distance from the press. He walked out the same way at 1:43 p.m., even as Obama's press secretary Jay Carney gave only meager details of what he insisted was a "private" get-together between the president and his defeated Republican rival.
Romney "congratulated the president for the success of his campaign and wished him well over the coming four years," according to the White House account of the meal. "The focus of their discussion was on America's leadership in the world and the importance of maintaining that leadership position in the future.
"They pledged to stay in touch, particularly if opportunities to work together on shared interests arise in the future," the statement said.
The lunch menu included white turkey chili and Southwestern grilled chicken salad.
The White House barred reporters from the event, but released an official photo showing Obama giving Romney a tour of the Oval Office.
Carney, briefing reporters while the lunch was going on, predicted that the two men would compare experiences from the campaign trail. "There aren't that many people who have run, been nominees for their party. There aren't that many people you can talk to who know what it's like."
Obama is "very interested in some of Gov. Romney's ideas," Carney insisted. But, when pressed, he would highlight only the Republican's widely praised rescue of the Salt Lake City Olympics and say that Obama hoped to apply Romney's know-how to his own efforts to make government more efficient.
That's a skill set, not an idea, one reporter pointed out. So are there actually ideas of Romney's that the president always either supported or opposed in the campaign but is now rethinking?
"There were certainly things that the two men agreed on" during the campaign, Carney said. "I wouldn't say it was the majority of things. It wasn't."
Still, Carney pointed to the three presidential debates and underlined that the erstwhile rivals had frequently professed to agree with each other.
He's right. Here's a sample of some of those moments. Note that some of the "agreements" are tactical attempts to score political points rather than any sincere assertion of commonality of purpose.
From the first debate:
Obama: "Gov. Romney and I both agree that our corporate tax rate is too high."
"I agree that the Democratic legislators in Massachusetts might have given some advice to Republicans in Congress about how to cooperate."
Romney: "I agree, education is key, particularly the future of our economy."
"We agree; we ought to bring the tax rates down, and I do, both for corporations and for individuals."
"Let's come back to something the president (and) I agree on, which is the key task we have in health care is to get the costs down so it's more affordable for families."
Or this exchange:
Obama: "One of the things I suspect Gov. Romney and I probably agree on is getting businesses to work with community colleges so that they're setting up their training programs ..."
Moderator Jim Lehrer: "Do you agree, Governor?"
Obama: "Let—let—let me just finish the point."
Romney: "Oh, yeah. Oh, yeah."
Or this one:
Lehrer: "Can the two of you agree that the voters have a choice, a clear choice, between the two of you?"
Romney: "Absolutely."
Obama: "Yes."
Sources:(Pete Souza/official White House photo) (Jason Reed/Reuters)
Monday, November 26, 2012
Former President Obasanjo and coronet Obas in Egba meet on Yoruba Culture and Tradition
Coronet Obas from over 60 towns in Egbaland, Ogun State, Nigeria attended a one-day retreat to ventilate how they can revamp the Yoruba heritage of culture and tradition to enhance their reign and rulership in this era of democratic governance.
Several Yoruba historians and traditionalists as well as legal experts and other social specialists presented papers that were as educative and entertaining.
The event was organized by the Village Network Empowerment Initiative, an Akinale based NGO in pursuit of rural empowerment through education.
Chief Olusegun Obasanjo, former President and Balogun Owu and other notable traditional rulers were in attendance.
|
ANTI-ROBBERY SQUAD HQTS IN ABUJA ATTACKED BY BOKO HARAM
The Special Anti-Robbery Squad (SARS) of the Nigeria Police Force headquarters, Abuja was attacked early this [Monday] morning by unknown gunmen.
Though details are still sketchy, there are speculations that some detained suspects including members of the dreaded Boko Haram terrorists may have been freed during the raid.
Police Force spokesman, Mr. Frank Mba, who is presently in Asaba, Delta State confirmed the attack to in a phone call. He said he would give us details of the incident as soon as he gets the facts.
Though details are still sketchy, there are speculations that some detained suspects including members of the dreaded Boko Haram terrorists may have been freed during the raid.
Police Force spokesman, Mr. Frank Mba, who is presently in Asaba, Delta State confirmed the attack to in a phone call. He said he would give us details of the incident as soon as he gets the facts.
Saturday, November 10, 2012
CONSTITUTION REVIEW: OPC President urges Legislature to reconsider Sovereign National Conference
The leader and founder of Odua Peoples Congress (OPC), Dr. Frederick Fasehun has called on the National Assembly to put into consideration the call by Nigerians for Sovereign National Conference (SNC) in the review of the constitution.
According to Fasehun, "we shall continue to demand for the convening of the Sovereign National Conference, SNC. This current Constitution is a handout from the Military; therefore no amount of tinkering and panel-beating can reform it into a people's document".
Fasehun in a statement made available to Thisday yesterday insisted that the National Assembly's ongoing review of the 1999 Constitution amounts to a brazen display of impunity.
He said "in view of Nigerians complaining that the presidential system is too expensive and should be jettisoned for the uni-cameral Parliamentary system?
Only the people can determine such and they will do so only in the atmosphere of a Sovereign National Conference."
However, on the dialogue with Boko Haram sect, Fasehun said OPC proposed that Boko Haram should expunge General Muhammadu Buhari from its list of delegates, except he confirms his bonafide membership of the group.
He said "Boko Haram has remained faceless; government must insist on not discussing with a faceless group, until the leaders are unveiled and known.
Much of Boko Haram's hostility has been turned against Christians; therefore, Christians, through the Christian Association of Nigeria (CAN), must be represented at the talks."
He added "negotiations should be opened up to accommodate other ethnic interests in the conflict, including: Ohanaeze Ndigbo, Afenifere, Middle-Belt Forum, Egbesu, MEND and other nationality groups, whose indigenes have been wantonly slaughtered by Boko Haram."
According to Fasehun, "we shall continue to demand for the convening of the Sovereign National Conference, SNC. This current Constitution is a handout from the Military; therefore no amount of tinkering and panel-beating can reform it into a people's document".
Fasehun in a statement made available to Thisday yesterday insisted that the National Assembly's ongoing review of the 1999 Constitution amounts to a brazen display of impunity.
He said "in view of Nigerians complaining that the presidential system is too expensive and should be jettisoned for the uni-cameral Parliamentary system?
Only the people can determine such and they will do so only in the atmosphere of a Sovereign National Conference."
However, on the dialogue with Boko Haram sect, Fasehun said OPC proposed that Boko Haram should expunge General Muhammadu Buhari from its list of delegates, except he confirms his bonafide membership of the group.
He said "Boko Haram has remained faceless; government must insist on not discussing with a faceless group, until the leaders are unveiled and known.
Much of Boko Haram's hostility has been turned against Christians; therefore, Christians, through the Christian Association of Nigeria (CAN), must be represented at the talks."
He added "negotiations should be opened up to accommodate other ethnic interests in the conflict, including: Ohanaeze Ndigbo, Afenifere, Middle-Belt Forum, Egbesu, MEND and other nationality groups, whose indigenes have been wantonly slaughtered by Boko Haram."
Tuesday, November 6, 2012
OBAMA RE-ELECTED INTO THE WHITE HOUSE
![]() |
Cheerful President Obama ! |
Barack Hussein Obama was re-elected President of the United States on Tuesday, overcoming powerful economic headwinds, a lock-step resistance to his agenda by Republicans in Congress and an unprecedented torrent of advertising as the nation voted to give him a second chance to change Washington.
In defeating Mitt Romney, the president carried Wisconsin, Iowa, New Hampshire, Colorado and Virginia and was holding on to a narrow advantage in Ohio and Florida. The path to victory for Mr. Romney narrowed as the night wore along, with Mr. Obama steadily climbing toward the 270 electoral votes needed to win a second term.
A cheer of jubilation sounded at the Obama campaign headquarters in Chicago when the television networks began projecting him as the winner at 11:20 p.m., even as the ballots were still being counted in many states where voters had waited in line well into the night. The victory was far narrower than his historic election four years ago, but it was no less dramatic.
As a succession of states fell away from Mr. Romney, a hush fell over his Boston headquarters on Tuesday night. Two advisers said in interviews that the contest seemed over, but Mr. Romney was not conceding, with the electoral votes from Ohio and Florida still outstanding.
The evening was not without the drama that has come to mark so many recent elections:
Even after Fox News Channel projected that Mr. Obama would win Ohio — effectively sealing Mr. Obama’s re-election — its on-air analyst, the Republican strategist Karl Rove, was arguing that it had done so too quickly and that Mr. Romney still had a chance.
His panics made up an important part of Mr. Obama’s winning coalition, preliminary exit poll data showed. And before the night was through, there were already recriminations from Republican moderates who said Mr. Romney had gone too far during the primaries in his statements against those here illegally, including his promise that his get-tough policies would cause some to “self-deport.”
Mr. Obama, 51, faces governing in a deeply divided country and a partisan-rich capital, where Republicans retained their majority in the House and Democrats kept their control of the Senate. His re-election offers him a second chance that will quickly be tested, given the rapidly escalating fiscal showdown.
For Mr. Obama, the result brings a ratification of his sweeping health care act, which Mr.Romney had vowed to repeal. The law will now continue on course toward nearly full implementation in 2014, promising to change significantly the way medical services are administrated nationwide.
Confident that the economy is finally on a true path toward stability, Mr. Obama and his aides have hinted that he would seek to tackle some of the grand but unrealized promises of his first campaign, including the sort of immigration overhaul that has eluded presidents of both parties for decades.
But he will be venturing back into a Congressional environment similar to that of his first term, with the Senate under the control of Democrats and the House under the control of Republicans, whose leaders have hinted that they will be no less likely to challenge him than they were during the last four years.
The state-by-state pursuit of 270 electoral votes was being closely tracked by both campaigns, with Mr. Romney winning North Carolina and Indiana, which Mr. Obama carried four years ago. But Mr. Obama won Michigan, the state where Mr. Romney was born, and Minnesota, a pair of states that Republican groups had spent millions trying to make competitive.
Americans delivered a final judgment on a long and bitter campaign that drew so many people to the polls that several key states extended voting for hours. In Virginia and Florida, long lines stretched from polling places, with the Obama campaign sending text messages to supporters in those areas, saying: “You can still vote.”
Neither party could predict how the outcome would affect the direction of the Republican Party. Moderates were hopeful it would lead the rank and file to realize that the party’s grass-roots conservatism that Mr. Romney pledged himself to during the primaries doomed him in the general election.
Tea Party adherents have indicated that they will argue that he was damaged because of his move to middle ground during the general election.
The results were more a matter of voters giving Mr. Obama more time than a second chance. Through most of the year slight majorities of voters had told pollsters that they believed his policies would improve the economy if they could stay in place into the future.
Mr. Obama’s campaign team built its coalition the hard way, through intensive efforts to find and motivate supporters who had lost the ardor of four years ago and, Mr. Obama’s strategists feared, might not find their way to polls if left to their own devices.
Up against real enthusiasm for Mr. Romney — or, just as important, against Mr. Obama — among Republicans and many independents, their strategy of spending vast sums of money on their get-out-the-vote operation seemed vindicated on Tuesday.
As opinion surveys that followed the first debate between Mr. Romney and Mr. Obama showed a tightening race, Mr. Obama’s team had insisted that its coalition was coming together as it hoped it would. In the end, it was not a bluff.
Even with Mr. Obama pulling off a new sweep of the highly-contested battlegrounds from Nevada to New Hampshire, the result in each of the states was very narrow. The Romney campaign was taking its time early Wednesday to review the outcome and searching for any irregularities.
The top issue on the minds of voters was the economy, according to interviews, with three-quarters saying that economic conditions were not good or poor. But only 3 in 10 said things were getting worse and 4 in 10 said the economy was improving.
Mr. Romney, who campaigned aggressively on his ability to turn around the deepest economic downturn since the Great Depression, was given a narrow edge when voters were asked which candidate was better equipped to handle the economy, the interviews found.
The electorate was split along partisan lines over a question that has driven much of the campaign debate, whether it was Mr. Obama or his predecessor, former President George W. Bush, who bore the most responsibility for the nation’s continued economic challenges. But about 4 in 10 of independent voters said that Mr. Bush should be held responsible.
The president built a muscular campaign organization and used a strong financial advantage to hold off an array of forces that opposed his candidacy. The margin of his victory was smaller than in 2008 — the winner of the popular vote was still in doubt early Wednesday – but a strategic firewall in several battleground states protected his Electoral College majority.
As Mr. Romney gained steam and stature in the final weeks of the campaign, one thing perhaps above all others that the Obama campaign put its hopes in: that the rebound in the auto industry after the president’s bailout package of 2009 would give him the winning edge in Ohio, a linchpin of his road to re-election.
Early interviews with voters showed that just over half of Ohio voters approved of the bailout, a result that was balanced by a less encouraging sign for the president: Some 4 in 10 said they or someone in their household had lost a job over the last four years.
The strong early-voting program was central to Mr. Obama’s performance in Ohio. He was narrowly leading Mr. Romney in Hamilton County, home to Cincinnati, but only because of the amount of votes he banked in the month leading up to Election Day.
Four years after Mr. Obama drew broad support across so many categories of voters, the national electorate appeared to have withdrawn to its more familiar, demographic borders, according to exit polls conducted by Edison Research. Mr. Obama’s coalition included disproportionate support from blacks, Hispanics, women, those under 30, those in unions, gays and Jews, though his support among Jews appeared to have diminished some.
Mr. Romney’s coalition included disproportionate support from whites, men, older people, high-income voters, evangelicals, those from suburban and rural counties, and those who call themselves adherents of the Tea Party — a group that had resisted him through the primaries but had fully embraced him by Election Day.
The Republican Party seemed destined for a new round of self-reflection over how it approaches Hispanics going forward, a fast-growing portion of the voting population that senior party strategists had sought to woo before a strain of intense anti-illegal immigration activism took hold within the Republican grassroots.
It was the first presidential election since the 2010 Supreme Court decision loosening restrictions on political spending, and the first in which both majorparty candidates opted out of the campaign matching system that imposes spending limits in return for federal financing. And the overall cost of the campaign rose accordingly, with all candidates for federal office, their parties and their supportive “super PACs” spending more than $6 billion combined.
The results Tuesday were certain to be parsed for days to determine just what effect the spending had, and who would be more irate at the answer — the donors who spent literally millions of dollars of their own money for a certain outcome, or those who found a barrage of negative advertising to be major factors in their defeats.
While the campaign often seemed small and petty, with Mr. Romney and Mr. Obama intensely quarreling and bickering, the contest was actually rooted in big and consequential decisions, with the role of the federal government squarely at the center of the debate.
Though Mr. Obama’s health care law galvanized his most ardent opposition, and continually drew low ratings in polls as a whole, interviews with voters found that nearly half wanted to see it kept intact or expanded, a quarter of wanted to see it repealed entirely and another quarter said they wanted portions of it repealed.
In Chicago, as crowds waited for Mr. Obama to deliver his speech, his supporters erupted into a roar of relief and elation. Car horns honked from the street as people chanted the president’s name.
“I feel like it’s a repudiation of everything the Republicans said in the campaign,” said Jasmyne Walker, 31, who jumped up and down on the edge of a stone planter in a downtown plaza. “Everybody said that if he lost it would be buyer’s remorse—that we were high on hope in 2008. This says we’re on the right track. I feel like this confirms that.”
In defeating Mitt Romney, the president carried Wisconsin, Iowa, New Hampshire, Colorado and Virginia and was holding on to a narrow advantage in Ohio and Florida. The path to victory for Mr. Romney narrowed as the night wore along, with Mr. Obama steadily climbing toward the 270 electoral votes needed to win a second term.
A cheer of jubilation sounded at the Obama campaign headquarters in Chicago when the television networks began projecting him as the winner at 11:20 p.m., even as the ballots were still being counted in many states where voters had waited in line well into the night. The victory was far narrower than his historic election four years ago, but it was no less dramatic.
As a succession of states fell away from Mr. Romney, a hush fell over his Boston headquarters on Tuesday night. Two advisers said in interviews that the contest seemed over, but Mr. Romney was not conceding, with the electoral votes from Ohio and Florida still outstanding.
The evening was not without the drama that has come to mark so many recent elections:
Even after Fox News Channel projected that Mr. Obama would win Ohio — effectively sealing Mr. Obama’s re-election — its on-air analyst, the Republican strategist Karl Rove, was arguing that it had done so too quickly and that Mr. Romney still had a chance.
His panics made up an important part of Mr. Obama’s winning coalition, preliminary exit poll data showed. And before the night was through, there were already recriminations from Republican moderates who said Mr. Romney had gone too far during the primaries in his statements against those here illegally, including his promise that his get-tough policies would cause some to “self-deport.”
Mr. Obama, 51, faces governing in a deeply divided country and a partisan-rich capital, where Republicans retained their majority in the House and Democrats kept their control of the Senate. His re-election offers him a second chance that will quickly be tested, given the rapidly escalating fiscal showdown.
For Mr. Obama, the result brings a ratification of his sweeping health care act, which Mr.Romney had vowed to repeal. The law will now continue on course toward nearly full implementation in 2014, promising to change significantly the way medical services are administrated nationwide.
Confident that the economy is finally on a true path toward stability, Mr. Obama and his aides have hinted that he would seek to tackle some of the grand but unrealized promises of his first campaign, including the sort of immigration overhaul that has eluded presidents of both parties for decades.
But he will be venturing back into a Congressional environment similar to that of his first term, with the Senate under the control of Democrats and the House under the control of Republicans, whose leaders have hinted that they will be no less likely to challenge him than they were during the last four years.
The state-by-state pursuit of 270 electoral votes was being closely tracked by both campaigns, with Mr. Romney winning North Carolina and Indiana, which Mr. Obama carried four years ago. But Mr. Obama won Michigan, the state where Mr. Romney was born, and Minnesota, a pair of states that Republican groups had spent millions trying to make competitive.
Americans delivered a final judgment on a long and bitter campaign that drew so many people to the polls that several key states extended voting for hours. In Virginia and Florida, long lines stretched from polling places, with the Obama campaign sending text messages to supporters in those areas, saying: “You can still vote.”
Neither party could predict how the outcome would affect the direction of the Republican Party. Moderates were hopeful it would lead the rank and file to realize that the party’s grass-roots conservatism that Mr. Romney pledged himself to during the primaries doomed him in the general election.
Tea Party adherents have indicated that they will argue that he was damaged because of his move to middle ground during the general election.
The results were more a matter of voters giving Mr. Obama more time than a second chance. Through most of the year slight majorities of voters had told pollsters that they believed his policies would improve the economy if they could stay in place into the future.
Mr. Obama’s campaign team built its coalition the hard way, through intensive efforts to find and motivate supporters who had lost the ardor of four years ago and, Mr. Obama’s strategists feared, might not find their way to polls if left to their own devices.
Up against real enthusiasm for Mr. Romney — or, just as important, against Mr. Obama — among Republicans and many independents, their strategy of spending vast sums of money on their get-out-the-vote operation seemed vindicated on Tuesday.
As opinion surveys that followed the first debate between Mr. Romney and Mr. Obama showed a tightening race, Mr. Obama’s team had insisted that its coalition was coming together as it hoped it would. In the end, it was not a bluff.
Even with Mr. Obama pulling off a new sweep of the highly-contested battlegrounds from Nevada to New Hampshire, the result in each of the states was very narrow. The Romney campaign was taking its time early Wednesday to review the outcome and searching for any irregularities.
The top issue on the minds of voters was the economy, according to interviews, with three-quarters saying that economic conditions were not good or poor. But only 3 in 10 said things were getting worse and 4 in 10 said the economy was improving.
Mr. Romney, who campaigned aggressively on his ability to turn around the deepest economic downturn since the Great Depression, was given a narrow edge when voters were asked which candidate was better equipped to handle the economy, the interviews found.
The electorate was split along partisan lines over a question that has driven much of the campaign debate, whether it was Mr. Obama or his predecessor, former President George W. Bush, who bore the most responsibility for the nation’s continued economic challenges. But about 4 in 10 of independent voters said that Mr. Bush should be held responsible.
The president built a muscular campaign organization and used a strong financial advantage to hold off an array of forces that opposed his candidacy. The margin of his victory was smaller than in 2008 — the winner of the popular vote was still in doubt early Wednesday – but a strategic firewall in several battleground states protected his Electoral College majority.
As Mr. Romney gained steam and stature in the final weeks of the campaign, one thing perhaps above all others that the Obama campaign put its hopes in: that the rebound in the auto industry after the president’s bailout package of 2009 would give him the winning edge in Ohio, a linchpin of his road to re-election.
Early interviews with voters showed that just over half of Ohio voters approved of the bailout, a result that was balanced by a less encouraging sign for the president: Some 4 in 10 said they or someone in their household had lost a job over the last four years.
The strong early-voting program was central to Mr. Obama’s performance in Ohio. He was narrowly leading Mr. Romney in Hamilton County, home to Cincinnati, but only because of the amount of votes he banked in the month leading up to Election Day.
Four years after Mr. Obama drew broad support across so many categories of voters, the national electorate appeared to have withdrawn to its more familiar, demographic borders, according to exit polls conducted by Edison Research. Mr. Obama’s coalition included disproportionate support from blacks, Hispanics, women, those under 30, those in unions, gays and Jews, though his support among Jews appeared to have diminished some.
Mr. Romney’s coalition included disproportionate support from whites, men, older people, high-income voters, evangelicals, those from suburban and rural counties, and those who call themselves adherents of the Tea Party — a group that had resisted him through the primaries but had fully embraced him by Election Day.
The Republican Party seemed destined for a new round of self-reflection over how it approaches Hispanics going forward, a fast-growing portion of the voting population that senior party strategists had sought to woo before a strain of intense anti-illegal immigration activism took hold within the Republican grassroots.
It was the first presidential election since the 2010 Supreme Court decision loosening restrictions on political spending, and the first in which both majorparty candidates opted out of the campaign matching system that imposes spending limits in return for federal financing. And the overall cost of the campaign rose accordingly, with all candidates for federal office, their parties and their supportive “super PACs” spending more than $6 billion combined.
The results Tuesday were certain to be parsed for days to determine just what effect the spending had, and who would be more irate at the answer — the donors who spent literally millions of dollars of their own money for a certain outcome, or those who found a barrage of negative advertising to be major factors in their defeats.
While the campaign often seemed small and petty, with Mr. Romney and Mr. Obama intensely quarreling and bickering, the contest was actually rooted in big and consequential decisions, with the role of the federal government squarely at the center of the debate.
Though Mr. Obama’s health care law galvanized his most ardent opposition, and continually drew low ratings in polls as a whole, interviews with voters found that nearly half wanted to see it kept intact or expanded, a quarter of wanted to see it repealed entirely and another quarter said they wanted portions of it repealed.
In Chicago, as crowds waited for Mr. Obama to deliver his speech, his supporters erupted into a roar of relief and elation. Car horns honked from the street as people chanted the president’s name.
“I feel like it’s a repudiation of everything the Republicans said in the campaign,” said Jasmyne Walker, 31, who jumped up and down on the edge of a stone planter in a downtown plaza. “Everybody said that if he lost it would be buyer’s remorse—that we were high on hope in 2008. This says we’re on the right track. I feel like this confirms that.”
source:New York Times
Saturday, October 27, 2012
ILLEGAL ARMS SHIPMENT TO NIGERIA-London Court Convicts A Briton
A Briton arms dealer was convicted yesterday by a London court for organising a huge illegal shipment of weapons to Nigeria.
Gary Hyde, a 43-year-old retired British volunteer police constable, was found guilty of helping to organise illegal shipment of 40,000 AK47 assault rifles, 30,000 rifles, 10,000 pistols and 32 million rounds of ammunition from China to Nigeria.
He was convicted by a jury and will be sentenced on 23 November at the Southwark Crown Court, the same court that jailed former Delta State Governor James Ibori for defrauding Nigeria.
Hyde was specifically charged with breaching the UK's Trade in Goods (Control) Order 2003 and concealing criminal property.
He was found guilty of both breaching the law and concealing commission payments, apparently the primary reason why the British tax authorities pursued him and that also led to the uncovering of other offences and eventual conviction.
Prosecutors said he moved the weapons from China to Nigeria between March 2006 and December 2007 without a licence and hid more than one million US dollars in commission payments.
An official of Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs, Peter Millroy, said: "Hyde was an experienced arms dealer who thought he could deliberately not comply with the law in order to make some extra money to hide offshore.
"He knew full well that his activity required a licence but he decided not to comply with the law, and we are delighted that after an extensive investigation he has been brought to justice".
Hyde had earlier protested his innocence, saying in a written statement to the court: "I do not believe that I engaged in any activity in the UK which I understood to require a licence but where instead I decided to ignore that obligation".
Mr Hyde was accused of involvement--along with his German business partner Karl Kleber--in alleged unlicensed shipment of the weapons from China to Nigeria.
But the case collapsed at the same Southwark Crown Court when the judge, Nicholas Loraine-Smith, declared "that this case has to fail in law" because the 2003 Order on which it was framed had been replaced in 2009.
The Power Of Plunder
Oil, or any
natural resources bonanza, has proved to be a curse to less-developed
nations. Nigeria is one of the worst examples. The temptation to steal
that money is irresistible to many and the result is pockets of luxury
surrounded by a sea of poverty. About half the population doesn’t even
have electricity. Roads, schools, hospitals and all sorts of
infrastructure are in short supply. Even the oil industry infrastructure
is plundered, which is why Nigeria only produces about half as much oil
(two million barrels a day) that it is capable of. Even that is enough
to account for 95 percent of exports and 40 percent of the federal
budget.
In the last year the government tried, for the first time, to
accurately count the losses in the oil industry. The conclusion was that
the theft, from pipelines and government bank accounts, amounted to
over $10 billion a year in the last decade. The annual GDP of Nigeria is
$238 billion, for a population of 165 million ($1,440 per capita). Oil
accounts for about 14 percent of GDP and unemployment is currently about
25 percent. The report revealed, in detail and for all to see, what a
lot of Nigerians had known for a long time. The theft is so pervasive
(40 percent of refined petroleum products are stolen) that the activity
is hard to miss. Eliminating the stealing will be difficult, because
most politicians and political parties are financed by stolen oil money.
The well-funded thieves are organized and determined to hang on to
their wealth. Judges and police can be bought and many oil thieves have
already been prosecuted and escaped. But there is progress. The oil
thieves are under attack, some do lose, but the war will go on for years
and there will be a lot of defeats.
In the north there is more and more popular hostility to Boko Haram. The Islamic radicals, despite pledges to clean up corruption and a lot of other problems, are being seen as a cure worse than the disease. As a result police are getting more tips about where Boko Haram members and equipment are hidden.
Investigations into how Boko Haram gets its weapons revealed that many of them come in via southern ports, taking advantage of corrupt customs officials. Smuggling is a big business and the bribed port officials usually don’t check to see that they are letting in illegally.
In the north police have uncovered a criminal gang that was pretending to be Boko Haram and killing southerners who refused to pay a large amount of cash to get off the hit list. Most paid but enough did not to leave a suspicious pattern of murdered people.
Nigeria and Niger have agreed to conduct joint patrols and coordinate operations along their 1,400 kilometer border, the better to limit Boko Haram movements.
October 21, 2012: In the northeast (Potiskum in Yobe State) the expected Boko Haram attacks took place, leaving over 30 dead and several government buildings burned down over the last two days. Thousands of people have begun leaving the city of Potiskum, which is 230 kilometers west of the Boko Haram stronghold of Maiduguri.
October 19, 2012: In the north (Borno State) a Boko Haram leader (Shuaibu Mohammed Bama) was arrested in the home of a politician (senator Ahmed Zanna) who had been suspected of supporting Boko Haram. Politicians have long been known to make deals with criminal organizations, and Boko Haram is no exception.
In the northeastern city of Maiduguri, troops battled Boko Haram attackers, leaving at least six dead (including a Chinese man shot down by Boko Haram).
October 18, 2012: In the northeast (Yobe State) an army raid hit a new Boko Haram hideout as the group was preparing to launch new attacks.
In the north there is more and more popular hostility to Boko Haram. The Islamic radicals, despite pledges to clean up corruption and a lot of other problems, are being seen as a cure worse than the disease. As a result police are getting more tips about where Boko Haram members and equipment are hidden.
Investigations into how Boko Haram gets its weapons revealed that many of them come in via southern ports, taking advantage of corrupt customs officials. Smuggling is a big business and the bribed port officials usually don’t check to see that they are letting in illegally.
In the north police have uncovered a criminal gang that was pretending to be Boko Haram and killing southerners who refused to pay a large amount of cash to get off the hit list. Most paid but enough did not to leave a suspicious pattern of murdered people.
Nigeria and Niger have agreed to conduct joint patrols and coordinate operations along their 1,400 kilometer border, the better to limit Boko Haram movements.
October 21, 2012: In the northeast (Potiskum in Yobe State) the expected Boko Haram attacks took place, leaving over 30 dead and several government buildings burned down over the last two days. Thousands of people have begun leaving the city of Potiskum, which is 230 kilometers west of the Boko Haram stronghold of Maiduguri.
October 19, 2012: In the north (Borno State) a Boko Haram leader (Shuaibu Mohammed Bama) was arrested in the home of a politician (senator Ahmed Zanna) who had been suspected of supporting Boko Haram. Politicians have long been known to make deals with criminal organizations, and Boko Haram is no exception.
In the northeastern city of Maiduguri, troops battled Boko Haram attackers, leaving at least six dead (including a Chinese man shot down by Boko Haram).
October 18, 2012: In the northeast (Yobe State) an army raid hit a new Boko Haram hideout as the group was preparing to launch new attacks.
source:Strategy Page
Tuesday, October 23, 2012
NDLEA RECOVERS 2.472KG COCAINE HIDDEN IN JEWELLERIES
*One suspect arrested
Officials of the National Drug Law Enforcement Agency (NDLEA) arrested one Oluigboka Chukwuemeka Emmanuel in connection with 2.472kg of Cocaine hidden in jewelleries.
Officials of the National Drug Law Enforcement Agency (NDLEA) arrested one Oluigboka Chukwuemeka Emmanuel in connection with 2.472kg of Cocaine hidden in jewelleries.
The 33 year old suspect
arrived from Brazil aboard
a KLM flight and was intercepted at the Murtala Mohammed International
Airport (MMIA), Lagos.
Airport (MMIA), Lagos.
During search, powdery
substances that tested positive for cocaine were found in his bag of jewelleries. It
took several hours to extract the
cocaine from the jewelleries because of the complex method of concealment.
Speaking on the latest discovery, NDLEA Airport Commander, Mr. Hamza Umar said that the drug was factory packed inside assorted jewellery,:“This mode of concealment is strange and it is the first time of discovering drugs inside jewelleries. The drugs were industrially packed in ear rings, buttons, necklaces, bangles as well as in female belts. We had to forcefully open them to recover the drugs. The entire quantity of cocaine found in the jewellery products weighed 2.472kg. One arrest has been made in connection with the seizure” Hamza stated.
Preliminary investigation revealed that the suspect who had lived in Brazil for over five years is believed to be working for a
suspected Brazilian based drug syndicate.
Speaking on the latest discovery, NDLEA Airport Commander, Mr. Hamza Umar said that the drug was factory packed inside assorted jewellery,:“This mode of concealment is strange and it is the first time of discovering drugs inside jewelleries. The drugs were industrially packed in ear rings, buttons, necklaces, bangles as well as in female belts. We had to forcefully open them to recover the drugs. The entire quantity of cocaine found in the jewellery products weighed 2.472kg. One arrest has been made in connection with the seizure” Hamza stated.
Preliminary investigation revealed that the suspect who had lived in Brazil for over five years is believed to be working for a
suspected Brazilian based drug syndicate.
However, Oluigboka
Chukwuemeka Emmanuel
in his statement said that he was smuggling the drug for a fee. In his
words, “I needed money for the burial anniversary of my late father As the breadwinner, everybody is looking up to me for the sponsorship of the anniversary. I have lived in Brazil for over 5 years but I have no money t undertake this important family responsibility. My interest was the 2,000 Euros they promised to pay me”. Oluigboka who is married with a child hails from Imo State.
Chairman/Chief Executive of the NDLEA, Ahmadu Giade warned that the Agency will halt the desperation of drug trafficking syndicates in the country. “Although drug barons are becoming more desperate, the Agency is determined to frustrate their efforts. This seizure is yet an indication that drug traffickers can go to any length in hiding their drugs from law enforcement
agents” Giade stressed.
The NDLEA boss also called for more public support in the anti-narcotic campaign stating that the factory mode of drug concealment is now worrisome. The suspect will soon be charged to court.
words, “I needed money for the burial anniversary of my late father As the breadwinner, everybody is looking up to me for the sponsorship of the anniversary. I have lived in Brazil for over 5 years but I have no money t undertake this important family responsibility. My interest was the 2,000 Euros they promised to pay me”. Oluigboka who is married with a child hails from Imo State.
Chairman/Chief Executive of the NDLEA, Ahmadu Giade warned that the Agency will halt the desperation of drug trafficking syndicates in the country. “Although drug barons are becoming more desperate, the Agency is determined to frustrate their efforts. This seizure is yet an indication that drug traffickers can go to any length in hiding their drugs from law enforcement
agents” Giade stressed.
The NDLEA boss also called for more public support in the anti-narcotic campaign stating that the factory mode of drug concealment is now worrisome. The suspect will soon be charged to court.
Friday, October 19, 2012
HAJJ 2012: Saudi Arabia bars Congo, Uganda Muslims over Ebola epidemic
Saudi Arabia has banned Muslims from the Democratic Republic of Congo and Uganda from making the pilgrimage to the holy city of Mecca this year because of cholera and Ebola epidemics in the region, a Congolese religious leader said yesterday.
“The Muslims living in DR Congo and even those in Uganda won’t participate in the pilgrimage to Mecca this year,” the head of DR Congo’s Islamic community, Sheik Abdallah Mangala, told AFP.
He said he thought the Saudi government had “made the decision to avoid any contamination from the Ebola and cholera viruses,” which have taken a heavy toll on the region in recent months.
Pilgrims have already begun to arrive in Saudi Arabia for the pilgrimage, the world’s largest annual gathering, which peaks around October 25 this year with more than one million Muslims expected.
DR Congo has been battling an outbreak of cholera, a contagious intestinal infection, for over a year, and of Ebola, one of the world’s most virulent diseases, since mid-August.
According to the World Health Organisation, which has not imposed any travel restrictions on the country, more than 20,000 people in DR Congo were infected with cholera in 2012, with a mortality rate of two percent.
Leodegar Bazira, the WHO official in DR Congo, said the organisation had recorded 74 Ebola cases since August, 36 of them deadly, putting the mortality rate at 50 percent. But he added that the disease was now under control and confined to the northeastern town of Isiro.
In Uganda, Ebola has killed 17 people since July, but officials announced earlier this month that the disease had been brought under control and urged all countries to lift travel restrictions on Uganda.
To date, there is no treatment nor vaccine for Ebola, a rare haemorrhagic disease that kills between 25 percent and 90 percent of patients, depending on the strain of the virus. It is named after a small river in DR Congo.
Cholera, which is caused by ingestion of contaminated food or water, can strike swiftly, causing intense diarrhoea, vomiting and nausea that lead to severe dehydration.
Two Nigerians arrested with hard drugs worth $33,300 in Bangkok
Two Nigerian men, suspected of being part of a drug smuggling ring, were arrested, yesterday, with 500 grams of crystal methamphetamine, also known as ‘ice,’ estimated at about $33,300 in eastern Bangkok’s Ramkhamhaeng area, according to narcotics suppression police.
Identified as Ahamefule Cosmos and Iriegbe Chinonso, the two suspects were detained at a convenience store near Ramkhamhaeng Soi 24.
Police took them to their apartment for further investigation and found 28 packages of crystal meth, weighing in total 500 grams valued at $33,300.
The arrest followed the arrest of Thai national Polsingha Putthasri, who held 100 grams of ‘ice,’ saying he bought the illegal drug from a Nigerian drug syndicate.
According to the initial investigation, the detainees claimed that their friend smuggled the drug for them to sell it to party-goers and tourists in Bangkok’s Ratchada and Nana areas.
Thursday, October 18, 2012
The Paris massacre that time forgot, 51 years on
By Tahar HANI
Fifty-one years to the day, French President François Hollande has recognised the October 17, 1961 massacre of Algerian protesters in Paris. Historian Jean-Luc Einaudi talks to FRANCE 24 about one of the darkest chapters of French colonial history.
Exactly 51 years after one of the murkiest episodes in recent French history, French President François Hollande recognised on Wednesday the "bloody repression" of Algerian protesters by French police that took place in the heart of Paris on October 17, 1961.
On that fateful day, French police – under the leadership of Paris prefect Maurice Papon – brutally crushed peaceful demonstrations of Algerian anti-war protesters who had gathered in and around the French capital to protest against a French security crackdown in Algeria.
The incident occurred at the height of the Algerian war of independence, when the French colonial administration was locked in a bitter battle with the Algerian National Liberation Front (FLN) – the Algerian party fighting for the North African nation’s liberation from France.
More than half-a-century later, the details surrounding the October 17 massacre – including the casualty figures – remain murky. A day after the demonstrations, the left-leaning French newspaper Libération reported the official toll as two dead, several wounded and 7,500 arrests. The death toll, however, was disputed by the FLN, which claimed that dozens were killed. Many of the bodies were found floating in the River Seine.
The October 17, 1961 incident would have remained obscure were it not for the efforts of one man: French historian Jean-Luc Einaudi, who doggedly pursued the case and published the results in his book, “La Bataille de Paris” (“The Battle of Paris”).
In 1991, when Einaudi published his definitive account of the events of October 1961, it caused a stir across France. French people were horrified to hear the details of a massacre by French police in the heart of the capital.
Details surrounding the events of October 1961 unravelled in the course of a landmark 1997 case against Papon for his participation in the deportation of thousands of Jews to concentration camps during World War II. At that time, Papon was police chief in the south-western province of Bordeaux.
During the trial, Einaudi took to the stand to testify against Papon and the direct role he played as Paris police chief in the October 1961 massacres. In 1998, Papon was found guilty of complicity in crimes against humanity during World War II.
In an interview with FRANCE 24 days before the 51st anniversary of the October 17 massacre and President Hollande's official recognition of the tragedy, Einaudi discussed the peculiar circumstances that made acknowledging the event a touchy subject in France.
Why has it been so difficult for France to officially recognise the killings in October 1961?
France has not yet officially recognized the crime for various reasons. The first is that French officials from that era have continued, for a long time, to occupy senior positions in French governments. Remember, Maurice Papon, who was Paris police chief in 1961, was a Cabinet minister right up to 1981.
In 1961, François Mitterrand was in the opposition. Once he became president [in 1981], Mitterrand did not dwell on events during the Algerian war – given his critical responsibilities as Interior and then Justice Minister during those years. There was a convergence of interests [within the French political establishment] to maintain a silence, a forgetfulness, a willful ignorance about this issue. It took a lot of research, the publication of books and a civil society movement to slowly uncover the truth.
I recall a crucial moment in 1999, when Maurice Papon filed a suit against me, which finally enabled the massacre to be recognized for the first time. This led to a gradual recognition of the events.
However, at the same time, the police chief responsible for these events [i.e. Papon] continued to try to impede the moves to raise awareness about this by lying and falsifying accounts.
On October 17, 2011, at an event on the Clichy bridge [on the outskirts of Paris, from where the mostly Algerian victims were thrown into the River Seine] presidential candidate François Hollande publicly promised to recognize this crime if he was elected president. He is now president of the republic. I expect him to meet his commitment.
Why are the events of October 1961 not well known by both French and Algerian youths?
In France, great strides have been made in raising awareness of the events. I’ve had many opportunities to talk about this issue to large gatherings, many of them comprised of students from different backgrounds, who have been very attentive.
I must also add that these events are now mentioned in [French] history books. But on these facts, like many others, the work must continue and will never be finished.
Regarding Algeria, internal conflict that followed independence [in 1962] have resulted, for many years, in sidelining, and even silence on, the role played by the Algerian diaspora, especially the Algerian immigrants in France during the Algerian war of independence. Too often, history has been manipulated for vested interests.
Do you think the events of October 1961 played a role in the Algerian war and the independence that Algeria finally won in 1962?
I think the October 17, 1961 massacre in Paris is one among many episodes of the Algerian war.
As such, it cannot be understood if we do not put it in the context of the war on Algerian territory. I would even say it cannot be understood if you do not bear in mind that France was in a state of colonial repression.
Senior officials, police, and security officials had been swimming in this ambiance for years and it had led to a characteristic mindset within the establishment. That said, the peculiarities of October 17 are twofold. On one hand, you have the emergence of an anti-colonial struggle in the very heart of the colonial power to support Algerian independence. On the other, you have a display of the full fury of the Paris police, a brutality that was the product of years of experience in the colonial war.
However, these events and the bloody repression did not decisively influence the negotiations between the French government and the Algerian provisional government [the government in exile that was set up during the Algerian independence war to represent the Algerian cause abroad, especially in international diplomatic circles].
[Then French President Charles] de Gaulle was determined to end this war, which isolated France internationally. The outcome had to be independence, which had the support of the vast majority of Algerians, including immigrants. The massacres of October 17 did not cause major reactions in France. They were largely concealed by official lies and overlooked due to public indifference. [French historian] Pierre Vidal-Naquet has called October 17, 1961, "the day that Paris did not stir”. I share this view.
FRANCE24
On that fateful day, French police – under the leadership of Paris prefect Maurice Papon – brutally crushed peaceful demonstrations of Algerian anti-war protesters who had gathered in and around the French capital to protest against a French security crackdown in Algeria.
The incident occurred at the height of the Algerian war of independence, when the French colonial administration was locked in a bitter battle with the Algerian National Liberation Front (FLN) – the Algerian party fighting for the North African nation’s liberation from France.
More than half-a-century later, the details surrounding the October 17 massacre – including the casualty figures – remain murky. A day after the demonstrations, the left-leaning French newspaper Libération reported the official toll as two dead, several wounded and 7,500 arrests. The death toll, however, was disputed by the FLN, which claimed that dozens were killed. Many of the bodies were found floating in the River Seine.
The October 17, 1961 incident would have remained obscure were it not for the efforts of one man: French historian Jean-Luc Einaudi, who doggedly pursued the case and published the results in his book, “La Bataille de Paris” (“The Battle of Paris”).
In 1991, when Einaudi published his definitive account of the events of October 1961, it caused a stir across France. French people were horrified to hear the details of a massacre by French police in the heart of the capital.
Details surrounding the events of October 1961 unravelled in the course of a landmark 1997 case against Papon for his participation in the deportation of thousands of Jews to concentration camps during World War II. At that time, Papon was police chief in the south-western province of Bordeaux.
During the trial, Einaudi took to the stand to testify against Papon and the direct role he played as Paris police chief in the October 1961 massacres. In 1998, Papon was found guilty of complicity in crimes against humanity during World War II.
In an interview with FRANCE 24 days before the 51st anniversary of the October 17 massacre and President Hollande's official recognition of the tragedy, Einaudi discussed the peculiar circumstances that made acknowledging the event a touchy subject in France.
Why has it been so difficult for France to officially recognise the killings in October 1961?
France has not yet officially recognized the crime for various reasons. The first is that French officials from that era have continued, for a long time, to occupy senior positions in French governments. Remember, Maurice Papon, who was Paris police chief in 1961, was a Cabinet minister right up to 1981.
In 1961, François Mitterrand was in the opposition. Once he became president [in 1981], Mitterrand did not dwell on events during the Algerian war – given his critical responsibilities as Interior and then Justice Minister during those years. There was a convergence of interests [within the French political establishment] to maintain a silence, a forgetfulness, a willful ignorance about this issue. It took a lot of research, the publication of books and a civil society movement to slowly uncover the truth.
I recall a crucial moment in 1999, when Maurice Papon filed a suit against me, which finally enabled the massacre to be recognized for the first time. This led to a gradual recognition of the events.
However, at the same time, the police chief responsible for these events [i.e. Papon] continued to try to impede the moves to raise awareness about this by lying and falsifying accounts.
On October 17, 2011, at an event on the Clichy bridge [on the outskirts of Paris, from where the mostly Algerian victims were thrown into the River Seine] presidential candidate François Hollande publicly promised to recognize this crime if he was elected president. He is now president of the republic. I expect him to meet his commitment.
Why are the events of October 1961 not well known by both French and Algerian youths?
In France, great strides have been made in raising awareness of the events. I’ve had many opportunities to talk about this issue to large gatherings, many of them comprised of students from different backgrounds, who have been very attentive.
I must also add that these events are now mentioned in [French] history books. But on these facts, like many others, the work must continue and will never be finished.
Regarding Algeria, internal conflict that followed independence [in 1962] have resulted, for many years, in sidelining, and even silence on, the role played by the Algerian diaspora, especially the Algerian immigrants in France during the Algerian war of independence. Too often, history has been manipulated for vested interests.
Do you think the events of October 1961 played a role in the Algerian war and the independence that Algeria finally won in 1962?
I think the October 17, 1961 massacre in Paris is one among many episodes of the Algerian war.
As such, it cannot be understood if we do not put it in the context of the war on Algerian territory. I would even say it cannot be understood if you do not bear in mind that France was in a state of colonial repression.
Senior officials, police, and security officials had been swimming in this ambiance for years and it had led to a characteristic mindset within the establishment. That said, the peculiarities of October 17 are twofold. On one hand, you have the emergence of an anti-colonial struggle in the very heart of the colonial power to support Algerian independence. On the other, you have a display of the full fury of the Paris police, a brutality that was the product of years of experience in the colonial war.
However, these events and the bloody repression did not decisively influence the negotiations between the French government and the Algerian provisional government [the government in exile that was set up during the Algerian independence war to represent the Algerian cause abroad, especially in international diplomatic circles].
[Then French President Charles] de Gaulle was determined to end this war, which isolated France internationally. The outcome had to be independence, which had the support of the vast majority of Algerians, including immigrants. The massacres of October 17 did not cause major reactions in France. They were largely concealed by official lies and overlooked due to public indifference. [French historian] Pierre Vidal-Naquet has called October 17, 1961, "the day that Paris did not stir”. I share this view.
FRANCE24
Tuesday, October 16, 2012
Governor Akpabio implores African Governments to invest in ICT
Posted by Lateef Lawal
Governments
in Africa have been advised to invest their resources in Information
Communication Technology (ICT) to enhance development.
The advise was given by Akwa Ibom
State Governor, Chief Godswill Akapabio in an interview with journalists at the
Murtala Mohammed International Airport (MMIA), Lagos yesterday on his way to
Dubai to deliver a paper at the Nigerian Day of ITU Telecom World 2012 in Dubai.
Akpabio warned that if governments
in the developing countries failed to embrace ICT, it would be impossible for
them to meet up with the happenings in the globe, insisting that the importance
of ICT in today’s world could not be overstressed.
Akpabio noted that in order not to
be caught napping, the Akwa ibom State government recently established an
e-library, the first of its kind in the West African sub-region, stressing that
the library covers an area of 31 square metres with a building footprint area
of 4, 000 square metres.
He explained further that users of
the library would have access to over 60 million downloadable e-books,
e-journals, audio and video books and would be able to learn new languages in
the language laboratory, adding that the library is fitted with anti-theft book
security device.
He however observed that Nigeria was
not left out in the revolution in the ICT world, which he analysed had moved
the country from paltry 600, 000 telephone lines in 1999 to over 100,000,000
mobile functional lines in 2012.
He emphasised that developing
nations needed to encourage their citizens to embrace ICT, stressing that this
was the greatest gift they could give to their posterity.
He said, “Currently, global
statistics on internet usage indicate that Nigeria is 11th in the
world and first in Africa with over 50 million estimated users. Among the 20
top countries in internet usage, Nigeria is the only African country included
and has more internet users than European countries like Spain, Italy and
Turkey.
“Statistics for patronage of the
leading social media platform, facebook, also shows that Nigeria comes at
number 31 and is the leading country in Africa while South Africa comes second
with 32.
“On our e-library in Akwa Ibom
State, it was designed as a one stop information and research centre. It has
over 30, 000 books and 350 ICT workstations. It comes complete with distance
learning support and professional certifications. With spacious conference
halls and video conferencing facilities, along with online public access
catalogue, we are poised t become a key driver in the ICT sector.”
Friday, October 12, 2012
Ogun State awards N100bn roads contract
*Roads on the list include-Ilo Awela[Sango-Ota], Lafenwa-Ayetoro road,Oke Aro-Ojodu-Abiodun roads,Sango-Ijoko,32 km Sango-Ijoko-Oke Aro-Ojodu Abiodun road etc.,
The Ogun Government yesterday announced the award of N100 billion contract for the re-construction of 12 roads across the three senatorial districts of the state.
In a statement issued in Abeokuta, the Commissioner for Works and Housing, Mr. Olamilekan Adegbite, said the contracts will improve the existing infrastructure in the state..
Adegbite said that the projects would gulp about N100 billion and would be completed within 24 months.
He listed the roads as ,, Oke Aro-Ojodu-Abiodun roads to link motorists direct from Sango-Ota in Ogun to Ojodu Berger in Lagos.
Others are the Sagamu-Benin Express Junction, Oba Erinwole road and Ejirin road-Oluwalogbon Junction in Ijebu-Ode; Ilisan-Ago/Iwoye road and Ikangba-Ilese road, all in the Ogun East Senatorial District.
The project also includes the Ilara-Ijohun road, Lafenwa-Ayetoro road, Ilo-Awela road in Ota and the 32 km Sango-Ijoko-Oke Aro-Ojodu Abiodun road in Ogun West Senatorial District.
According to Adegbite, the Ojere-Adatan Roundabout, OGTV-Brewery Junction and Moshood Abiola Way in the Ogun Central Senatorial District are also included.
The Ogun Government yesterday announced the award of N100 billion contract for the re-construction of 12 roads across the three senatorial districts of the state.
In a statement issued in Abeokuta, the Commissioner for Works and Housing, Mr. Olamilekan Adegbite, said the contracts will improve the existing infrastructure in the state..
Adegbite said that the projects would gulp about N100 billion and would be completed within 24 months.
He listed the roads as ,, Oke Aro-Ojodu-Abiodun roads to link motorists direct from Sango-Ota in Ogun to Ojodu Berger in Lagos.
Others are the Sagamu-Benin Express Junction, Oba Erinwole road and Ejirin road-Oluwalogbon Junction in Ijebu-Ode; Ilisan-Ago/Iwoye road and Ikangba-Ilese road, all in the Ogun East Senatorial District.
The project also includes the Ilara-Ijohun road, Lafenwa-Ayetoro road, Ilo-Awela road in Ota and the 32 km Sango-Ijoko-Oke Aro-Ojodu Abiodun road in Ogun West Senatorial District.
According to Adegbite, the Ojere-Adatan Roundabout, OGTV-Brewery Junction and Moshood Abiola Way in the Ogun Central Senatorial District are also included.
Wednesday, October 10, 2012
4,000 Nigerians in Turkey prisons –says Police I.G,Abubakar
The Inspector-General of Police, Mr.
Mohammed Abubakar, yesterday, in Lagos, said that no fewer than 4,000
Nigerians are in Turkey prisons over drug related and human
trafficking offences.
The IG who arrived from
Turkey, vowed to fish out killers of the four students of University of
Port Harcourt and those at Mubi, in Adamawa State.
Briefing journalists on
arrival at the Police Air Wing, Ikeja, Abubakar explained that his
visit to Turkey was to share experience, exchange ideas and acquire
knowledge from his Turkish counterpart. He noted that both countries
would soon sign a Memorandum of Understanding, MoU.
He, however, expressed dismay at the
number of Nigerians in Turkey prisons, saying: “Turkey is a very central
country and most drug and human traffickers, pass through there. Unfortunately,
we have 4,000 Nigerians who are in various prisons in that country. So, you can
see that every day in the international airport in Turkey, arrests are made of
drug and human traffickers, most of whom are Nigerians.”
He said that investigations into
the circumstance that led to the gruesome killings of the four
University of Port Harcourt students and those at Mubi, Adamawa State,
had commenced. “The investigation will tell what happened. I want to
assure Nigerians that we are doing our best to apprehend the culprits of those
ugly incidents and we shall not tolerate such barbaric acts in this
country. Nigerians will hear from me as soon as I am briefed by the
Commissioners of Police and the Zonal Assistant Inspector Generals, based on
their documentations,” he said.
Abubakar debunked insinuations that
there was disharmony between the Police and students, explaining that it was
improper for the police to storm the premises of any University without a
written invitation by the Vice Chancellor.
He added that the responsibility of
fishing out the killers rests more on traditional rulers and residents of the
areas.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
Buhari presents 2021 Budget to National Assembly
President Muhammadu Buhari Thursday , 8,October, 2020, formally tabled the Executive’s proposed budget for the 2021 fiscal year to a joint s...
-
On July 22, Anders Behring Breivik, a 32-year-old Norwegian right-wing extremist, planted two bombs near an Oslo government buildi...
-
Bola Bello, a 54-year-old Nigerian trader who was arrested for allegedly stealing an eight-month-old baby boy was on Thursday arraigned befo...